Innovation

Hard Drives and SSDs

The synergy of hard drives and SSDs in the digital world.

From online banking to social media and streaming, much of today’s human experience depends on digital infrastructure that is underpinned by two storage technologies—hard drives and solid-state drives (SSDs). While to the average person, these technologies may seem hidden behind everyday experiences, they shape how data is stored, accessed, and managed. Understanding their development and differences reveals not just how they support today’s infrastructure, but also how they can meet the demands of tomorrow.

The evolution of storage technologies.

From the early days of mainframes and personal computers to today’s AI-driven workloads, storage technologies have evolved to meet changing demands. As digital needs have expanded, both hard drives and SSDs have advanced to play distinct and crucial roles in modern infrastructure. Their evolution reflects the constant adaptation of storage media to support diverse applications and environments—delivering capacity, performance, form factors, and sustainability for the world’s increasing data requirements.

Read the story.Close the story.
hard-drives-and-ssds-row4-1440x900

Hard drives and SSDs have supported the world’s digital infrastructure for decades—and will continue to coexist.

The timeline above shows how storage technologies have evolved to meet shifting demands. 

Throughout the 1950s to the 1980s, hard drives using longitudinal magnetic recording (LMR) enabled mainframes, which were the workhorses of early computing, supporting a range of business and scientific tasks. By the 1980s, LMR-based hard drives continued to play a key role in advancing computing capacity. These early systems represented centralized computing, where data processing was concentrated within mainframe servers with mass storage, and typically accessed via client terminals with little or no storage. 

In the 1980s and 1990s, personal computers, including laptops, became mainstream, relying exclusively on hard drives to deliver capacity and affordability for everyday tasks. Seagate invented the first PC hard drives in this era, using LMR to achieve a groundbreaking 5MB capacity in a 5.25-inch form factor. These drives allowed users to store operating systems, applications, and large volumes of files locally, fueling the rapid growth of the PC market. This period marked a shift toward decentralized computing, as PCs enabled data processing at local endpoints rather than central systems. Hard drives remained the dominant PC storage medium well into the 2000s, offering a cost-effective solution for expanding desktop and laptop use.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, as consumer demand for more portable computing grew, laptops became increasingly popular. During this period, SSDs utilizing NAND flash memory, a technology that stores data as electrical charges within semiconductor cells, emerged. Commercially released in 1987, the first iteration used 2D NAND, which stores data in a single layer of cells. Within this structure, single-level cell (SLC) flash was used to store one bit of data per cell, catering to the demand for speed and responsiveness in consumer devices. As laptops evolved further into the early 2000s, priorities shifted toward thinner designs with longer battery life. SSDs facilitated these advancements by reducing power consumption while enabling fast read and write speeds through direct, random access to data, making them especially effective for accelerating OS boot-times, and enhancing application experiences. SSDs also introduced significantly thinner form factors (e.g., mSATA, M.2, and U.2), contributing to the thinner and lighter designs of modern laptops. These form factors replaced the bulkier 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch hard drives in laptops, enabling more streamlined device profiles.

By the mid-2000s, data storage had transformed again. In 2005, hard drives began using perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR), which significantly increased data density and enabled higher storage capacities at lower costs. Unlike LMR, which aligned magnetic bits horizontally on the platter, PMR stands the bits vertically, allowing for tighter packing and greater stability. This approach addressed the superparamagnetic limit—a phenomenon where magnetic bits become unstable and prone to data loss when packed too closely together. By orienting the magnetic bits perpendicularly, PMR overcame this limit, enabling reliable data storage at much higher densities. PMR’s increased data density provided the foundation necessary to support the massive storage demands that emerged in data centers through the 2010s. This development was particularly important in data centers, which took on most of the burden of managing exploding data volumes. 

From the late 2000s through the 2010s, the proliferation of mobile phones, cloud computing, increasing internet speeds, and the rise of 4G connectivity—which propelled data-intensive mobile applications that further drove demand for cloud-based storage—drove a monumental societal and technological shift. Data processing and storage moved from local devices to centralized cloud data centers, which began to serve as the primary hubs for managing and storing data generated by mobile and IoT devices. Large-scale data centers gained prominence as applications and data migrated to the cloud. This transition accelerated in the 2010s, when enterprise cloud adoption surged due to the cost efficiencies and innovation potential of centralized storage. Much of the mass-capacity storage, supported by hard drives with increased data density made possible by PMR technology, began shifting to cloud infrastructure, which became a central repository for managing growing volumes of data remotely. While mobile phones stored data locally on embedded NAND flash, much of the content they generated was uploaded to the cloud—regional data centers primarily built on hard drives that supported efficient, large-scale data storage. Similarly, modern laptops stopped using local hard drives for primary storage. Instead, they began to store and back up data via cloud-based systems, which handle the bulk of file management and sharing. This shift represented a return to some centralization in data management, as cloud infrastructure addressed the need to manage exploding data volumes at scale. 

Meanwhile, SSD innovations like multi-level cell (MLC) and triple-level cell (TLC) NAND increased capacity and performance in compact devices and enterprise environments that needed rapid data retrieval. Released in 2013, 3D NAND marked a significant leap forward by stacking memory cells vertically to increase density and lower costs per bit. This innovation enabled SSDs to further expand capacities and achieve better endurance. Additionally, M.2 SSDs, which emerged in the early 2010s, offered a more flexible and space-efficient design compared to traditional SATA SSDs, contributing to further reductions in laptop thickness and weight. Around this same time, hard drives then pushed their capacities further with shingled magnetic recording (SMR), introduced in 2013, a formatting approach built on PMR that creates shingles of overlapping data tracks to maximize storage density. 

In 2024, PMR had reached its physical limits; it could no longer increase areal density by packing magnetic bits any closer together without making the data unstable. Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) overcame this issue by using a new kind of magnetic media that keeps the grains stable even as they become smaller and more densely packed. This is achieved by briefly heating the disk surface with a tiny laser, allowing the recording head to write data bits at higher densities. This technology advancement represented a seismic shift in the storage industry, enabling bit densities of 5TB per platter, or 50TB per hard drive.

Today, the most advanced hard drives use the Seagate Mozaic 3+™ technology platform to deploy HAMR for unprecedented areal density gains, while SSDs leverage quad-level cell (QLC) NAND. These advancements have directed each technology to different roles. Hard drives are central to massive cloud, edge, and enterprise data centers, where they economically store and protect enormous volumes of data to enable—among other workloads—the training of AI models. SSDs are critical in very high-performance applications in these data centers and provide vital local storage for consumer devices.

These environments continue to drive the storage landscape.

Understanding the technology differences.

Hard drives and SSDs each play unique roles in storage use cases due to their fundamentally different technological approaches to reading and writing data.

hard-drives-and-ssds-row9-1440x1080
Read the story.Close the story.

SSDs are built on NAND flash memory, where data is stored as electrical charges within semiconductor cells. Advances in research, development, and manufacturing have increased bit densities by shrinking cell sizes and adding vertical layers. SSDs offer lightning-fast performance, which is ideal for applications that demand quick access and low latency. 

But SSDs come with trade-offs. Data is written and rewritten using program erase cycles, which over time, wear down the NAND cells. This gradual degradation impacts SSD endurance, especially in write-heavy environments. Techniques like wear-leveling and overprovisioning have been developed to extend SSD lifespans, but these measures can introduce efficiency losses.  

Hard drives rely on intricate mechanical engineering to store and retrieve data. At the core of each drive are rapidly spinning platters, which are coated with a magnetic material. These platters rotate at high speeds, enabling data to be written and read efficiently. Data is recorded on the platter surfaces using magnetic heads, which are attached to a moving actuator arm. This arm moves with nanoscale precision, positioning the heads to write and read data at specific tracks on the platters. 

Unlike SSDs, which rely on electrical charges, hard drives use magnetic recording that doesn’t degrade over repeated writes, ensuring long-term durability. The moving parts introduce some physical latency, but the design is highly reliable. Magnetic recording also retains data without the wear issues associated with NAND cells, making hard drives well-suited for large-scale data storage that prioritizes capacity over speed.

Working in tandem.

With these distinctions, it’s no surprise modern data centers often use both technologies. SSDs handle tasks requiring rapid, random access, while hard drives store vast amounts of data affordably. They form a harmonious pair that meets the diverse needs of today’s data-driven world.  

Most data centers use both technologies in tandem, with each playing to their strengths. While more costly than hard drives, SSDs deliver the low-latency performance essential for specific high-demand use cases. They can be the preferred choice for applications that demand quick response times, such as high-frequency trading, real-time analytics, and content streaming.

In comparison, hard drives excel in large-scale data storage, driven by cloud computing’s rapid growth in exabytes. In the world’s largest data centers, hard drives store close to 90% of data due to their unmatched cost efficiency, scalability, and sustainability. Seagate innovations in areal density have given hard drives a 6:1 cost-per-TB advantage, which is crucial for organizations focused on managing acquisition costs and total cost of ownership (TCO).  

By leveraging SSDs for performance-critical applications and hard drives for large volumes of less time-sensitive data, data centers can effectively optimize for both cost and performance. This combination provides a flexible, economical solution.

Where enterprise CapEx meets storage industry CapEx.

The vast majority of enterprise data is associated with general-purpose workloads that prioritize capacity over speed: analytics, file services, backup, and object storage. Hard drives, with their cost-per-TB advantage and durability, are ideally suited for these workloads. Use cases requiring rapid data access and low latency—such as finance and science simulations, real-time graphic rendering, and transactional databases—need a significantly smaller proportion of enterprise data. Flash excels in these more specialized, high-performance scenarios. Optimizing TCO for large-scale deployments depends on aligning the right storage media with specific workload requirements.

For cloud providers and enterprises, controlling CapEx is a constant priority when scaling. Hard drives offer a cost-effective solution, with significantly lower acquisition costs compared to SSDs. This makes them ideal for large-scale deployments where capacity is the primary need. Hard drives also deliver a better TCO, as their cost-per-TB advantage enables organizations to expand capacity affordably while minimizing long-term operational expenses.  In addition to offering TCO benefits, the hard drive industry’s unique manufacturing efficiency—up to nine times more CapEx efficient than NAND production—allows it to produce far more exabytes at a fraction of the capital investment required by the NAND industry. This efficiency is critical in helping data centers meet massive storage demands affordably and reliably, supporting the ongoing growth of cloud, edge, and enterprise data centers. As a result, hard drives enable data centers to optimize their CapEx budgets without compromising on the scale or sustainability of their infrastructure. This advantage is especially relevant for enterprises that must balance growth with budget constraints, as hard drives can provide scalable mass storage without the prohibitive costs associated with SSDs.

This CapEx efficiency ensures a more consistent supply chain. By leveraging established production lines and economies of scale, manufacturers can produce larger volumes of hard drives at lower costs, providing the massive capacity that data centers require to handle explosive data growth. This scalability is critical for enterprises that need to expand storage while managing costs, making hard drives central to both immediate and long-term data strategies.

Sustainability also plays a significant role, as data centers consume a substantial portion of global power and contribute to carbon emissions. Hard drives help mitigate these impacts by using 75% less operational power per terabyte than SSDs and generating one-tenth the embodied carbon. Lower power consumption directly reduces operational expenses and environmental impact, while reduced embodied carbon aligns with long-term sustainability goals.

Comparing the roles of hard drives and SSDs.

Hard drives and SSDs continue to bring unique strengths to different storage environments, from massive cloud data centers to compact personal devices. Their contrasting technologies shape how they handle capacity, performance, and durability, making them better suited for specific use cases and applications. The table below highlights these key attributes, illustrating how and where each technology excels.

Two storage technologies, working together.

  Hard Drives
SSDs
Recording Technology
Magnetically writes data onto spinning disks
Electronically writes data to memory cells on circuit boards
Primary Use Case Large-scale cloud and edge data centers  Edge data centers and endpoint/client devices (including PC’s, laptops, tablets, phones)
Primary workloads Analytics, file services, object storage

Document management, web hosting, AI retention, secondary storage, active archive, backup and data protection
E-commerce, VDI, gaming, CRM/ERP/ CMS, database, AI/ML training, real-time graphic rendering, finance and science simulations [add edge/endpoint use cases]
Use case data transfer requirement
Nominal-Time Real and Ultra Real-Time
Storage environment
Cloud 
(large data center)
Edge 
(small enterprise)
Endpoint 
(PC/Laptop, tablet, phone)
Cloud 
(large data center)
Edge 
(small enterprise)
Endpoint 
(PC/Laptop, tablet, phone)
Scale Exabyte
Petabyte-Terabyte 
Terabyte
>500TB Petabyte
50-500TBTerabyte
2-50TB Terabyte
Example use cases S3 Storage, Analytics, Data Protection File Services, Active Archive, Data Protection Backup E-commerce, finance and science simulations Database, real-time graphic rendering Gaming
Mass Storage +++
+/-
---
+/-
+/-
+++
Total Cost of Ownership
+++
+++
+/-
---
+/- +++
Scalability
+++
+++
---  ---
+/-
+++
Performance
+++
+/-
---
+++
+++
+++
Data Endurance and Durability
+++
+++
N/A 
---
+/-
+++
Sustainability (Lifecycle Impact)
+++
+++
+++
---
---
---
Power Consumption
+++
+/-
---
---
+/-
+++
$/TB
+++
+++
---
---
-/+
+++
  1. +++ = preferred product choice

    +/- = product choice dependent on use case and capacity

    --- = not a preferred product choice or use case

    Performance = combined read/write and IOPS. 
    *Seagate analysis of IDC Worldwide Global StorageSphere Forecast 2024-2028; June 2024, IDC #US52312824.

Two storage technologies, working together.

Hard drives and solid-state drives are essential storage technologies with fundamentally different approaches to reading and writing data. SSDs deliver high-speed, low-latency performance, making them ideal for applications that require quick data access and rapid processing. By combining cost-effectiveness, high areal density, and sustainability, hard drives enable enterprises to address both current data needs and future growth sustainably, providing a balance that SSDs cannot achieve when scaled to the same levels.